---
title: "SAP Healthcare Integration System"
slug: "sap-integration-healthcare"
summary: "Bidirectional integration processing 100k+ transactions/day with 99.9% uptime"
client: "Confidential - Healthcare Multinational"
industry: "Healthcare"
timeline: "6 months"
role: "Integration Architect"
image: ""
tags:
  - SAP
  - C#
  - .NET
  - Integrations
  - Enterprise
  - Healthcare
featured: true
order: 1
date: 2023-06-15
seo_title: "Case Study: SAP Healthcare Integration - 100k Transactions/Day"
seo_description: "How we architected SAP integration system processing 100k+ daily transactions with 99.9% uptime for healthcare company."
seo_keywords: "SAP integration, C#, .NET, SAP Connector, enterprise integration, healthcare"
---

## Overview

**Client:** Healthcare Multinational (confidential)
**Size:** 100,000+ employees
**Project:** Benefits integration
**Timeline:** 6 months
**My Role:** Integration Architect

---

## Challenge

Client had internal benefits management system that needed to sync with SAP ECC to process payroll.

### Main pain points:
- Manual process prone to errors
- 3-5 day delay between systems
- 100k employees waiting for processing
- Load spikes (month-end)

### Constraints:
- Limited budget (no SAP BTP)
- Small internal SAP team (2 developers)
- Tight deadline (6-month go-live)
- Legacy .NET Framework 4.5 system

---

## Solution

Bidirectional integration architecture:

```
[Internal System] ←→ [Queue] ←→ [SAP Connector] ←→ [SAP ECC]
       ↓                              ↓
  [MongoDB Logs]              [ABAP Z_BENEFITS]
```

### Components:
- .NET Service with SAP Connector (NCo 3.0)
- Custom ABAP transaction (Z_BENEFITS)
- Queue system (RabbitMQ) for retry logic
- MongoDB for audit and troubleshooting
- Scheduler (Hangfire) for batch processing

### Flow:
1. System generates changes (new hires, modifications)
2. Service processes batch (500 records/batch)
3. SAP Connector calls Z_BENEFITS via RFC
4. SAP returns status (success/error)
5. Automatic retry if failure (max 3x)
6. MongoDB logs for troubleshooting

---

## Results

### Metrics:
- **100k+** transactions/day processed
- **99.9%** uptime
- Reduced **5 days → 4 hours** (delay)
- **80%** reduction in processing time
- **Zero** manual errors (vs 2-3% before)

### Benefits:
- Employees receive benefits on-time
- HR team saves 40h/month (manual work)
- Complete audit (compliance)
- Scalable (30% year-over-year growth without refactor)

---

## Tech Stack

`C#` `.NET Framework 4.5` `SAP NCo 3.0` `RabbitMQ` `MongoDB` `Hangfire` `Docker` `SAP ECC` `ABAP` `RFC`

---

## Decisions & Motivation

### Decision 1: SAP Connector vs SAP BTP

**Options evaluated:**
- SAP BTP (events, modern APIs, cloud)
- SAP Connector (direct RFC, on-premise)

**We chose:** SAP Connector

**Motivation:**
- Client had on-premise SAP ECC (not S/4)
- Budget didn't allow BTP license
- SAP team comfortable with ABAP/RFC
- Needs met with RFC (didn't need real-time event-driven)

**Accepted trade-off:**
- Less "modern" than BTP, but 100% functional
- $0 additional cost vs $30k+/year BTP
- 2 months faster delivery (no BTP learning curve)

---

### Decision 2: Queue System vs Direct Calls

**Options evaluated:**
- Direct synchronous calls (simpler)
- Queue with retry (more complex)

**We chose:** Queue + Retry

**Motivation:**
- SAP occasionally unavailable (maintenance)
- Load spikes (month-end = 200k requests)
- Ensure zero data loss
- Resilience > simplicity (critical environment)

**Implementation:**
- RabbitMQ with dead-letter queue
- Exponential retry (1min, 5min, 15min)
- Alerts if 3 consecutive failures

**Result:**
- Zero data loss in 2 years production
- HR team doesn't need to "keep watch"

---

### Decision 3: Custom ABAP vs Standard

**Options evaluated:**
- Standard SAP BAPIs (zero ABAP code)
- Custom transaction (Z_BENEFITS)

**We chose:** Custom transaction

**Motivation:**
- Standard BAPIs didn't have business-specific validations
- Client wanted logic centralized in SAP (single source of truth)
- Allowed complex validations (eligibility, dependents, limits)

**Trade-off:**
- Requires ABAP maintenance (internal SAP team)
- But: Client preferred vs duplicate logic (risk of desync)

---

### Alternatives NOT Chosen

**Webhook/Callback (Event-Driven):**
- Client had no infrastructure to expose APIs
- Internal system behind firewall
- Batch polling works well for the case

**Kubernetes Microservices:**
- Overkill for single integration
- Team had no K8s expertise
- Simple Docker sufficient

**Real-time Sync (<1min):**
- Business doesn't need (daily batch ok)
- Infrastructure cost would increase 3x
- 4h delay acceptable for payroll

---

## Learnings

### What worked very well:
- Involve SAP team from day 1 (buy-in)
- MongoDB for logs (10x faster troubleshooting)
- Retry logic saved countless times

### What I would do differently:
- Add health check endpoint earlier
- Monitoring dashboard from start (added later)

### Lessons for next projects:
- Client "limited budget" ≠ "limited solution" - creativity solves
- Document ALL architectural decisions (team turnover)
- Simplicity beats complexity when both work (KISS)

---

## Need Something Similar?

Complex SAP integrations, legacy systems, or high-availability architecture?

[Let's talk about your challenge →](/#contact)
